In the 2005-2006 school year, all parents will receive written notice of new
policies from your children's schools. Many schools will ask you to sign
permission slips, allowing school counselors or or “advocates” to conversations with your children. You will be told how your local schools are now involved in vision and dental screenings, learning disabilities and speech impediment screenings, and other acts of kindness, but watch for the small print or the extra little blurb, which states that your children will also be evaluated for emotional wellness. Watch for wording like "happiness indicators" or "family participation."

The fact is that our president has mandated that every American child, age 3 through 18, is federally ordered to be evaluated for mental health issues and to receive 'enforced' treatment. Welcome to President Bush's New Freedom Initiative and New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Welcome to life-long profiling and drug addictions, New Freedom-style.

52 million students and six million adults working in schools, according to this
commission, will be tested and should flush out at least 6 million people, or
shall we say new customers, who will then be mandated to receive "treatment."
What treatment does our president's commission have in mind? The newest drugs in the pharmaceutical pipelines, of course. The commission recommends "specific
medications for specific conditions."

One of the state-of-the-art treatments, and most expensive, is an implanted capsule - yes, that's right, implanted. The capsule delivers medication into a child’s body without the child having to swallow a pill or the need for parental permission for dispensation.

The New Freedom Commission named the Texas Medication Algorithm Project
(TMAP) a model treatment plan. Medical algorithms are a flowchart-style
treatment indicator. If you have A symptom and B symptom, take C medication.
TMAP began with the University of Texas, big pharma, and the mental health and
corrections system in Texas. The American Psychiatric Association concurs that
TMAP is brilliant.

However, the New Freedom Initiative and Commission is a political-big pharma marriage. Many companies who supported TMAP were also major contributors to Bush’s re-election funds. For example, Eli Lilly manufactures olanzapine - one of the drugs recommended in the New Freedom plan, and furthermore, George Herbert Walker Bush was once a member of Lilly's board of directors. Our current President Bush appointed Lilly's chief executive officer, Sidney Taurel, as a member of the Homeland Security Council. Eighty-two percent of Lilly's $1.6 million in political contributions in 2000 went to Bush and the Republican Party. Do tell!…

Texas Algorithm grossed over 4 billion dollars in 2003 and olanzapine is Eli Lilly's top selling drug. A 2003 New York Times article by Gardiner Harris claims that 70 percent of olanzapine sales are paid for by government agencies, such as Medicare and Medicaid. And lo and behold, guess who is now able to bill Medicaid for health services? Public schools, of course, as they are now under the big pharma-political profits/pay-back umbrella once they adopt screening policies. Public schools can now be paid to screen and drug your kids.

Now, if you ever wonder, ever again, if public-private partnerships care about people, then you need a brain transplant. Your children are now the legislated guinea pigs and lab rats for the pharmaceutical companies who bought and paid for our president's campaign. Favors are now returned to those companies in the form of enforced, juvenile customers, their health, and their future drug addictions.

But wait, there is more. The New Freedom Commission also calls for enforced treatment. That means that parents have no rights to refuse the treatment recommenced by TMAP and other drug dispensing corporate-bureaucratic apparatuses. And as the mental health bureaucracy is also involved in this financial game of insidious cruelty, parents and families are also to be investigated via the result of their children's screenings in schools. In other words, schools are now the across-the board, or shall I say nation, diagnostic tool for big pharma and child control.

And there's more. The U.N. Agenda 21 has also called for total intrusion into schools and children lives. No more religion, no more individuality, no more real education, no more real grades, no more real teaching, no more teacher respect for parents, and no more truth from teachers or principals. This sounds very familiar and very political to me. And I've said it before, and I will say it again: if you are of a religious ilk and you refuse to allow your children to be abused by our "educational system", the stage is being set for you to lose physical custody of your children. I suggest that you read this: Rethinking Orphanages for the 21st Century by Richard McKenzie, ed

Still got your kids in public schools? Shame on you, and may God bless your poor children and forgive you.

Websites for Wisdoms:

www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd64.htm
www.newswithviews.com/Eakman/beverly26.htm

(...)
But how did things get to such a point? What was it that allowed our
country to have become so arrogant? Was it our taming of The West? Was it our near annihilation of The American Indian, the original inhabitants of this
country? Was it our ability to have been so successful in an enslavement of The
African American people? Was it our capacity to have economically ravaged
Central America and The Caribbean? Was it our capacity for technological
development? How about our having bombed Viet Nam and Cambodia into near
stone-age oblivion? Then there was our war with Iraq in 1991, and the fact that
we were able to kill 350 Iraqis for every American soldier who died. And what
about our ability to have been so good at polluting the earth's atmosphere
setting the stage for a rather tragic warming of the world? Or the fact that
four percent of the world's population has been so successfully able to have
consumed 35% of the world's wealth? And what about the fact that we, no doubt,
have the greatest military force in the history of the world, one that could
destroy the entirety of the human race several times over? And what about our
willingness to have thumbed our noses at nearly every institutional effort to
resolve some of the world's most grave problems (The World Court, The Kyoto
Treaty on Climate Change, The Anti-Ballistic Treaty with Russia, The 2001 UN
Conference on Racism, as well as other international attempts to resolve pending
world problems). And finally, we can bask in the glory of having been so
successful in bringing peace, prosperity and security to a democratic
Iraq!
(...)